1. Contact | ||||||
1.1 Contact organisation | ||||||
Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) | ||||||
1.2 Contact organisation unit | ||||||
National Accounts and Economic Statistics Department (DICS) Short-term Economic Statistics Directorate (DCSC) Short-term Employment and Income Statistics Division (OCC) Units OCC/B and OCC/D | ||||||
1.3 Contact name | ||||||
1.4 Contact person function | ||||||
1.5 Contact mail address | ||||||
Istat - Italian National Institute of Statistics Via Tuscolana, 1788 - 00173 Rome – Italy | ||||||
1.6 Contact email address | ||||||
1.7 Contact phone number | ||||||
1.8 Contact fax number | ||||||
2. Metadata update | ||||||
2.1 Metadata last certified | ||||||
05/02/2015 | ||||||
2.2 Metadata last posted | ||||||
23/09/2014 | ||||||
2.3 Metadata last update | ||||||
05/02/2015 | ||||||
3. Statistical presentation | ||||||
3.1 Data description | ||||||
Indices of Number of persons employed and Gross wages and salaries (STSIND, STSCONS, STSRTD, STSSERV). These indicators are produced by the OROS survey, through the integration of Social Security administrative data (collected by the Social Security Institute-INPS), used mainly for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and the survey data on labour input and labour costs on the large enterprises (LES) used for large enterprises (LEs). Data from these two surveys allow the calculation of the wages and salaries indicators, while data on the number of employees, drawn from the two surveys, are integrated with National Accounts data, in order to get the estimate on the number of persons employed. | ||||||
3.2 Classification system | ||||||
NACE Rev. 2. | ||||||
3.3 Coverage - sector | ||||||
Annex A: divisions 05-36; Annex B: section F; Annex C: division 47; Annex D: divisions 45-46 and sections H, I, J, M_STS, N_STS | ||||||
3.4 Statistical concepts and definitions | ||||||
Number of persons employed and Gross wages and salaries are defined in coherence with Commission Regulation EC No 1503/2006. | ||||||
3.5 Statistical unit | ||||||
Reporting and observation unit: Enterprise | ||||||
3.6 Statistical population | ||||||
Number of persons employed: all enterprises with at least one employed person which were active in the reference quarter in the STS economic activities. In 2013, these enterprises were, on average about 4.5 millions. Gross wages and salaries: all enterprises with at least one employee which were active in the reference quarter in the STS economic activities. In 2013, these enterprises were, on average over the four quarters, about 1.2 millions. | ||||||
3.7 Reference area | ||||||
The area covered by the survey is the whole national territory. | ||||||
3.8 Coverage - Time | ||||||
The indicators classified by the NACE Rev. 2 are available since 2000. | ||||||
3.9 Base period | ||||||
The base year of the survey is 2010. Data according to this base year are available from 1st quarter 2000 onwards. | ||||||
4. Unit of measure | ||||||
Index | ||||||
5. Reference Period | ||||||
Quarter | ||||||
6. Institutional Mandate | ||||||
6.1 Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | ||||||
Legal basis: Decreto Ministeriale 05.02.1969 and Decreto Ministeriale 24.02.1984. Obligation on units to provide data: The enterprises are obliged to pay the social contribution and to submit the monthly declaration (DM10 form until December 2009, UniEmens since January 2010) to INPS within 30 days after the end of the reference month. All firms which do not meet those obligations can be condemned to administrative and penal sanctions. | ||||||
6.2 Institutional Mandate - data sharing | ||||||
None. Data at this level are shared only internally at Istat. | ||||||
7. Confidentiality | ||||||
7.1 Confidentiality - policy | ||||||
Links to relevant acts on statistics are presented on the website of Sistan - National Statistical System – (http://www.sistan.it/index.php?id=203). | ||||||
7.2 Confidentiality - data treatment | ||||||
All the employment indicators are treated as confidential. Gross wages data are confidential at 2 digit Nace level (or more). Data are free at section and MIG level. | ||||||
8. Release policy | ||||||
8.1 Release calendar | ||||||
At the moment data are not released. | ||||||
8.2 Release calendar access | ||||||
No calendar because no release | ||||||
8.3 Release policy - user access | ||||||
| ||||||
9. Frequency of dissemination | ||||||
Quarterly (to Eurostat) | ||||||
10. Accessibility and clarity | ||||||
10.1 Dissemination format - News release | ||||||
Not avaialble. | ||||||
10.2 Dissemination format - Publications | ||||||
At the moment data are not released. | ||||||
10.3 Dissemination format - online database | ||||||
Not available because data are not released | ||||||
10.4 Dissemination format - microdata access | ||||||
Not available because data are not released | ||||||
10.5 Dissemination format - other | ||||||
Data are transmitted to Eurostat quarterly, within the 60 day regulation deadline for what concerns employment indicators and 90 day deadline referring to gross wages, both in Gesmes format. | ||||||
10.6 Documentation on methodology | ||||||
Details on the LES and OROS surveys are available at the Information System for Survey documentation and Quality Control (Siqual), on Istat’s Internet website, respectively at the link http://siqual.istat.it/SIQual/visualizza.do?id=0026500 and http://siqual.istat.it/SIQual/visualizza.do?id=5000065 Other sources and methodologies for the estimation of gross wages and salaries indicators and number of employees indicators are described in the following Istat methodological document: “Il sistema degli indicatori congiunturali sulla domanda di lavoro e le retribuzioni in Ateco 2007 e base 2005” (see Doc.1 in Italian). Information on the administrative data used as main source in the OROS survey can be found in the following document: Rapiti F.M., Ceccato F., Congia M.C., Pacini S. and Tuzi D. “What have we learned in almost 10-years experience in dealing with administrative data for short term employment and wages indicators?” (see Doc.2). An overview on the integration of sources and processes for the production of the main short term business indicators on labour market at Istat is described in the following document: Baldi C., Bellisai D., Ceccato F., Pacini S., Serbassi L., Sorrentino M., Tuzi D., The system of short term business statistics on labour in Italy. The challenges of data integration (see Doc.3). At the moment no published documentation is available on the method used to estimate the total number of persons employed. Until March 2013 this indicator was approximated by the number of employees, available from the OROS+LES. In order to extend the definition to the total number, National Accounts Annual data have been used together with the OROS data. Internal documentation on the procedure followed is available at request. | ||||||
10.7 Quality management - documentation | ||||||
Not available specifically on the STS indicators production process. Some information on the quality management in the survey are available in the following links: http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2008/04/sde/wp.8.e.pdf http://www3.istat.it/dati/pubbsci/documenti/Documenti/doc_2010/doc_5_2010.pdf | ||||||
11. Quality management | ||||||
11.1 Quality assurance | ||||||
The data are produced in accordance with the European Statistics Code of Practice and with its Italian version (http://www3.istat.it/istat/attivita/codice_statistica.pdf). | ||||||
11.2 Quality management - assessment | ||||||
The Oros Survey is an innovative case of short-term statistics produced with the help of administrative sources (Social Security data) in order to cover all size enterprises in the private sectors. The use of administrative data in short-term statistics implies paying attention to unusual statistical quality aspects. Statisticians cannot prevent or reduce no-sampling errors in raw administrative data capturing, and some ex-post traditional editing techniques, like questionnaire revision and enterprise recalling, are not applicable. The complexity of the production process is also caused by the huge number of records and the highly disaggregated level of raw data. In fact, given the short-time constraint in the releases, the Italian NSO was obliged to capture data from the Italian Social Security Institute without any previous process of aggregation and checking. So, the retrieval and translation of the administrative data into statistical information is one of the most critical aspect to be faced at the beginning of the process; and its effectiveness has a significant impact on the quality of the final indicators. On the other hand, the availability of very disaggregated data allows for the exploitation of a very rich informative source for different statistical aims, and for a more direct control on the overall translation phase. When the statistical variables have been made available, a more traditional micro level check procedure is applied. Editing on outliers and anomalous values, and imputation of unit non responses may consequently be needed, with a particular attention to influential observations. Considerations linked to the quality of data suggest a micro-level integration between the administrative source and the Large Enterprises Survey data. This integration involves a record-linkage aspect and the computation of harmonised variables. At the end of the process, a macro data validation is carried out which implies, among other aspects, time series analysis and macro-level comparisons with other statistical sources. Finally, the standardization and documentation of the whole check and editing process is a fundamental target of the OROS quality procedure (for further details on the quality management in the Oros survey see: Congia M.C. and Rapiti F.M. “Quality assessment and reporting in a short-term business survey based on administrative data” available at the link: http://www3.istat.it/dati/pubbsci/documenti/Documenti/doc_2010/doc_5_2010.pdf and Congia M.C., Pacini S., Tuzi D. “The Editing Process in the Italian Short-Term Survey on Labour Cost based on Administrative Data” available at the link: http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2008/04/sde/wp.8.e.pdf. | ||||||
12. Relevance | ||||||
12.1 Relevance - User Needs | ||||||
Eurostat is the main user. Data produced are coherent with the requests of the STS regulation. | ||||||
12.2 Relevance - User Satisfaction | ||||||
The data are considered satisfying the STS regulation requests by Eurostat. | ||||||
12.3 Completeness | ||||||
All STS requirements are fulfilled. However data on employment at all Nace levels and on wages at two digits level (and more) are still confidential. | ||||||
13. Accuracy | ||||||
13.1 Accuracy - overall | ||||||
Assessing accuracy in the OROS and LEs Surveys implies taking into account only non-sampling errors. Both the data sources refer to the census of the target units. Given the massive quantity of administrative micro data (used for SMEs), highly processed by the National Statistical Institute (see §12.2 and §20.5), editing and imputation of measurement and processing errors must be very careful and cover the whole production process, necessary following very selective criteria (given the very strict release timeliness). Even imputation of non reporting units, at micro level, is performed only for a limited group of influential units while a macro level correction adjusts for non reporting on the remaining part of the population. The use of auxiliary information from the Business Register and from the more updated Tax Register help defining the list of target units in the Social Security Register reducing problems of over-coverage. Survey data (used for LEs) refer to enterprises with more than 500 employees at the base year 2010, this group adds up to about 1.4 thousand enterprises covering about 20% of total employment in Italy in the STS sectors. Each one of these firms has a considerable influence on the estimates. Editing and imputation on these data are global (all units are checked) and performed by very expert personnel, assuring very high quality data and fast management of changes in units legal asset, non responses, errors, etc. When considering accuracy, the micro level integration between the administrative records and the Large Enterprises Survey data must also be considered. Record linkage and computation of harmonised variables are the main processes to be taken into account. | ||||||
13.2 Sampling error | ||||||
Estimations are not based on samples. | ||||||
13.3 Non-sampling error | ||||||
Measurement errors on the administrative data have affected very few units during the years and, during the last four years, they have deeply decreased due to the greater attention that the Social Security Institute is paying on a very recent new system of data collection. As far as it concerns non responses the administrative data framework (used for SMEs) must be distinguished by the survey data framework (used for LEs). In the preliminary estimate the administrative data coverage in term of units is about 95-98%; in the final (census) estimation the coverage in term of units is about 99.9%. For what concerns Survey data, non response of LEs tends to increase gradually as the time span increase from the base year. During 2012 non reporting enterprises were about 6%. Monthly reminders (by e-mail and fax) and intensive follow-ups by phone are addressed to non responding LE units. Two times a year a warning with penalty (registered letter with return receipt) is sent to firms that have not answered to LES in the previous three months. | ||||||
14. Timeliness and punctuality | ||||||
14.1 Timeliness | ||||||
| ||||||
14.2 Punctuality | ||||||
Employment: Still some problems to achieve punctuality, even if timeliness has significantly been improved in the last years. During 2012 the delay was no more than 1 day with the exception of August delivery (Q2:2012) when the delay was 7 days. Unfortunately for this delivery the delay cannot be definitively eliminated, given the actual estimation methodology, because of the summer holidays that delay response from enterprises and the statistical production processes. Wages: punctuality is always achieved. | ||||||
15. Coherence and comparability | ||||||
15.1 Comparability - geographical | ||||||
Employment and wages indicators are defined in coherence with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1503/2006. The data cover the entire national territory. | ||||||
15.2 Comparability - over time | ||||||
OROS-LES have been subjected to several methodological innovations over the time. In order to guarantee coherence in the time series, linking factors have been calculated on overlapping periods and applied to the quarters estimated in old methodology. | ||||||
15.3 Coherence - cross domain | ||||||
Quarterly National Accounts data, Quarterly Labour Force Survey data. Comparisons with Structural Business Data on annual basis. Level of coherence is good. Differences can be attributed to the different methodologies used to estimate the considered aggregates and to the different levels of coverage, concepts, definitions and classifications. | ||||||
15.4 Coherence - internal | ||||||
Good coherence between indicators, known the differences in methodology, concepts, definitions etc. | ||||||
16. Cost and Burden | ||||||
6 persons work at ISTAT for the “OROS" unit (“Occupazione, Retribuzioni ed Oneri Sociali”) , 7 persons work for the indicators on Large Enteprises unit. To produce the STS indicators Istat did not increase at all the burden on enterprise because it has been used a pre-existent survey (LES-Large firms Survey), administrative data, National Accounts data. None of the auxiliary Surveys used to calculate the STS indicators requires additional information for the STS objectives. To get to the same results with a traditional business survey, more than 15,000 firms should have been surveyed and as a result a new heavy burden on business and high costs for NSI would have emerged. | ||||||
17. Data revision | ||||||
17.1 Data revision - policy | ||||||
Employment and wages indicators for STS follow the same revision policy: the estimates are calculated in a unique process, using the same sources of data. The discrepancy between the preliminary estimate and later ones depends on the revisions of the OROS-LES indicators. In a standard practice of revisions, figures that contribute to this aggregate’s estimate are revised four times before they become final, that occurs after one year from their first publication. The main reasons of revision are: • the final version of the administrative micro data which are checked by INPS on reporting units, substitutes completely the preliminary version (which is checked and edited only by Istat); • non reporting units in the preliminary data are present in the final version; • some variables based on other external sources (e.g. Nace Rev.2 economic activity classification from different edition of the BR, etc.) are computed and estimated using the most updated version of the data; • the annual revision of the LES data referred to the previous year, included in the OROS-LES estimates yearly, in the delivery of the first quarter; • non standard revisions (es. transition to a new base year). For what concerns the estimation of the number of persons employed, as stated in §3.1., data from National Accounts are used. The production of these data do not follow a standard revision policy; as a consequence non standard revisions may (in case of relevant revisions of NA data) characterize the release of this indicator for STS. Given the not significant magnitude of the NA data revisions observed starting from the first release of this indicator, they have been used according to the OROS standard revision policy. An internal vintage database exists and can be made available at request. | ||||||
17.2 Data revision - practice | ||||||
In the release of June 2014, with the first transmission of Q1:2014 and according to the standard Oros revision policy, all the quarters of 2013 both on employment and wages figures have been revised: The average revisions of the indices on the number of persons employed with respect to the previous data transmission (December 2013) were:
Wages and gross salaries indices were revised, with respect to December 2013 transmission:
| ||||||
18. Statistical processing | ||||||
18.1 Source data | ||||||
| ||||||
18.2 Frequency of data collection | ||||||
| ||||||
18.3 Data collection | ||||||
Administrative data are used for SMEs and a questionnaire for large enterprises. The Social Security Institute (INPS) stores administrative data in electronic format and delivers them to ISTAT using inter-institutional electronic transmission. Data referring to the large enterprise survey are collected monthly by questionnaire via website, e-mail or fax | ||||||
18.4 Data validation | ||||||
Analysis on non responses and outliers. Corrections (imputation) at micro (based on selective criteria) and macro level. Checks are carried out via both automated procedures and experts’ analyses on data. For the large enterprises sub population, reporting units may also be contacted again in order to validate or correct the data. The files that are sent to Eurostat are produced from data stored in an Oracle database via a generalised Istat software. After their production, they are not checked with any further software or specialized tool. | ||||||
18.5 Data compilation | ||||||
Once administrative data are captured an extensive and complex check and editing procedure covers the whole Oros production process (for more details see: Congia M.C., Pacini S., Tuzi D. “The Editing Process in the Italian Short-Term Survey on Labour Cost based on Administrative Data” http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2008/04/sde/wp.8.e.pdf). The translation of administrative data into statistical information is the first step: check and imputation is necessary not only to correct administrative micro data but also to modify translation procedures and metadata errors to follow frequent changes in administrative concept and definitions. Once the statistical variables have been made available a more traditional micro level check procedure becomes necessary. Outliers correction may consequently be needed, particularly in the case of influential observations. Check and imputation of the outliers in the LES data follow a traditional interactive process, in which there can be a direct feedback with the firms. For the administrative INPS data extensive edit procedures check for accuracy and consistency. Given the enormous number of records to check, the editing procedures are very selective. The automatic editing is utilised in very few cases. The micro editing process includes the comparison of the values of all variables available (e.g. number of employees, wages per employee, other labour costs, etc.) reported for two consecutive months by the same unit to detect large changes or errors in reporting. Whenever there is a very large change or the data appear inconsistent in any of the variables, the records are flagged. Subsequently, the records flagged at least in one variable are ordered for size of wages and other labour costs changes. The record are displayed and checked on the screen, which shows a very complete dashboard with all information about the unit under control helping the editor to understand if the anomalies are errors or just outliers. They can be acknowledged and values are further treated as correct. Then the errors are manually corrected if necessary. In principle this process ought to allow to make reliable statistics, however some errors in small size units remain undetected, and some could show up only after micro-data aggregation. The preliminary population is extremely large but the number of units which are singled out as relevant outliers is very little. Furthermore, measurement errors in the administrative data have gradually disappearing over the time. At the scheduled time for the acquisition of the provisional population, it may happen that some INPS data are missing for the preliminary estimates due to delays depending on firms liability or administrative system flaws. These late reporters are considered unit non-responses. Imputation of non reporting units at unit level is, at the moment, performed only on a sub group of units of the OROS target population, the temporary employment agencies, because of their strong relevance in terms of employment: the absence of even few of these units in the provisional population may impact even on the target per capita variables estimates. Because no alternative sources are available on these units, actually they are not included in the target population of the LES, imputation is the way as unit non-responses are adjusted. Imputation of these units is highly based on longitudinal criteria, using all the available information on the units to be imputed themselves over the time. Correction for non reporting on the rest of the population of the administrative data is performed through a macro level approach that exploits the reporting and non reporting behaviours over the time. For what concerns LES, the methodology of estimating missing data (unit and item non responses) works on a deterministic basis. It uses both information of clusters defined in terms of economic activity and time series data of the enterprise itself. The integration between the administrative data on SMEs and the survey data on LEs is one of the final step in the process and is justified by the fact that large firms were underrepresented in the early reporters used for the OROS preliminary estimates. The integration procedure aims at replacing admin with survey data for the overlapping enterprises. This implies record linkage, singling out of corporate events, that must be monitored quarterly, harmonization of variables. For more details on the integration of the two sources see: Baldi C., Bellisai D., Ceccato F., Pacini S., Serbassi L., Sorrentino M., Tuzi D., “The system of short term business statistics on labour in Italy. The challenges of data integration”http://www.ine.es/e/essnetdi_ws2011/ppts/Baldi_et_al.pdf. The OROS and the LES sources allow the estimation of wages and salaries number of employees indicators. In order to get estimates on the remaining part of the number of persons employed, Annual National Accounts data are also used. These data are quarterly disaggregated using as indicators the quarterly employment estimates by the OROS+LES data. | ||||||
18.6 Adjustment | ||||||
The indices of employment are available only in unadjusted form. | ||||||
19. Comment | ||||||
None.. |